wogga

http://reefbuilders.com/2011/10/10/lookdown-gyre-tank/

no way of guaranteeing that that chemical alone, and not that chemical IN PROPER PROPORTIONS with with MgCl etc is responsible.

Ron Popeil approves.

smaller water changes with higher frequency, rather than the other way around.

can't lose fish when you don't keep em! sorry to hear about it, though.

floydrturbo?

too many fish.

sounds like you should just do a fowlr tank, ryan.

Updates?

...gotta give more information. What size is your tank? What kind of lights are you running and how far from the surface of the water? What are your water parameters (now and historically)? What else is in the tank? (this includes both intentionally introduced items such as coral AND unintentional items such as GHA, bubble algae, cyano, etc) How big is the clam ? Do you feed it? If so, how (target? water column with the pumps off? etc)? Also what do you feed it? Is there anything else going on out of the ordinary in the tank? pH/alk/Ca spikes etc? Did you lose power in the outage?

+1.

Sounds like your standard 'it may survive, but most certainly won't thrive' scenario, eh?

Thanks for the headsup, Steve! Everyone be careful out there.

In all practical terms - is there really any way for us to reverse what we've done to the oceans aside from just leaving the planet? Mankind's population has been on the exponential rise with no signs of leveling out (let alone decreasing) for hundreds of years. No matter how 'responsible' the policies lawmakers may put into place, are we still not doomed to produce too much waste? I hate to sound like a fatalist, but really - is there even any hope? I'm really frightened to find out what happens to non-marine biological factors when 90%+ of the life in the ocean loses its habitat (and inevitably dies). I really don't think any actions taken by any lawmaker can solve the problem. I'm also fairly certain that the U.S. and India are not likely to adopt a China-like replacement-only reproductive policy - so the world population is going to continue to increase on an exponential scale. We're not going to turn back to pre-industrial-revolution technology/lifestyles (unless forced to by depletion of oil reserves). Isn't that really the cause? Too many people X mass produced waste = no hope of balance.