Jump to content

New ATO controller


ctenophore

Recommended Posts

Hi All!

 

Our pressure-sensing level switch used in our Davy Jones Skimmate Locker has a great dual role: auto top-off controller! It's magnet-mounted, so installation anywhere in your sump is a snap (literally; watch your fingers as the magnet will hold through 3/4" glass!) Snails can't crawl on it and cause a false signal, and calcium can't build up on it and cause it to stick like magnetic floats. No moving parts means less chance of failure.

 

autotopoff_md.png

 

Special deal: Order with either a K1 or K2 Kalk Stirrer and save $10!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nicely integrated package, guys. I really like the magnet mount idea. This is perfect for those little nano's with their tightly integrated sumps in back. Is there any hysteresis in the differential pressure switch to keep it out of a bang-bang (rapid toggling between on and off) situation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Justin, hope you dont mind me answering.

 

Tom, no, these pressure switches are awesome. The part that goes in the tank is basically just an air tube (nothing that would be affected by the magnet). As soon as water rises to the level of the tube, the pressure insude the tube begins to rise and trips the switch. The electrical portion of the differential pressure switch is mounted in the relay box. No electrical wires near water or the magnet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nicely integrated package, guys. I really like the magnet mount idea. This is perfect for those little nano's with their tightly integrated sumps in back. Is there any hysteresis in the differential pressure switch to keep it out of a bang-bang (rapid toggling between on and off) situation?

Says this on the web-page

...and features a built-in range buffer to prevent hysteresis, or rapid on-off switching that sometimes occurs...

sounds cool. Mine clicks on-&-off-&-on-&-off... because of movement in the sump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Justin, you may want to correct that "prevent hysteresis" (if, as Larry has shown, this is what it says on the website) as that is exactly what you want. Hysteresis is what prevents the "on-off" switching. It's what was present in the old 7414 inverters - it's a positive feedback loop that helps to drive the response away from the balance point.

 

I'm familiar with these differential pressure switches. I'm just wondering if you're able to quantify the hysteresis. Since it's sensitive to a 1/2" WC pressure, I can't imagine that it would be much.

 

Also, now that I'm thinking about it, is there an internal option to rewire it to be normally open (NO) rather than normally closed (NC)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, now that I'm thinking about it, is there an internal option to rewire it to be normally open (NO) rather than normally closed (NC)?

 

A question that I have as well. (Or can it be used as a low level switch?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Justin, you may want to correct that "prevent hysteresis" (if, as Larry has shown, this is what it says on the website) as that is exactly what you want. Hysteresis is what prevents the "on-off" switching. It's what was present in the old 7414 inverters - it's a positive feedback loop that helps to drive the response away from the balance point.

 

I'm familiar with these differential pressure switches. I'm just wondering if you're able to quantify the hysteresis. Since it's sensitive to a 1/2" WC pressure, I can't imagine that it would be much.

 

Also, now that I'm thinking about it, is there an internal option to rewire it to be normally open (NO) rather than normally closed (NC)?

Whoops, good catch Tom. Thanks :)

I will update the site. Re: quantification, do you mean distance or lag time? units?

 

Our original prototypes had a NC/NO switch but we removed it to make wiring simpler and keep cost down. As I mentioned to Chad, we can wire up some NO ones easily enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Justin, you may want to correct that "prevent hysteresis" (if, as Larry has shown, this is what it says on the website) as that is exactly what you want. Hysteresis is what prevents the "on-off" switching. It's what was present in the old 7414 inverters - it's a positive feedback loop that helps to drive the response away from the balance point.

 

I'm familiar with these differential pressure switches. I'm just wondering if you're able to quantify the hysteresis. Since it's sensitive to a 1/2" WC pressure, I can't imagine that it would be much.

 

Also, now that I'm thinking about it, is there an internal option to rewire it to be normally open (NO) rather than normally closed (NC)?

 

 

Tom,

 

The switch has an internal regulated hysteresis of 50% of the set point. The set point is .1psi so the reset is approx .05psi This prevents the rapid on/off cycles, although since the switch is rated for 10,000,000+ cycles it would be of little concern if there was a bit of cycling.

 

The switch can be wired for NO rather than NC as Justin mentioned, but we are also planning a digital out version that can hook into aquarium controllers that will be able to use the more advanced logic those devices are capable of so we are trying to get that product to market first and see if there is still interest in the NO hardwired version.

 

Dan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Bump for a question on attaching the switch to a controller (I have an AC3). Do you need to buy the breakout box for the AC3 or does this simply plug into the controller?

 

I have an Osmolator which works great, but it requires another $60 option if I want to use a peristaltic pump with it to pump topoff from my basement. It also has no way to send me alarms via email if something goes wrong.

 

As far as reliability goes, have you noticed any issues with salt creep around the opening affecting reliability? I'm guessing for something that goes in and out of the water, this would be a problem, but it seems like reliability is one of the chief benefits of this switch in that it's not affected by coraline or salt creep. :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Couldn't you also adjust the diameter of the sensor to change how sensitive the entire unit is to water level changes? A larger tube would trip the pressure switch with just a small change in water level, but a smaller tube would require a larger change in water level. (Or maybe I have it backwards? Hydraulics makes my head hurt.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, John, you have the physics right... yes, a larger tube should make the level variation smaller. With the increased sensitivity, I would think the number of undesired cycles would go up to, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, John, you have the physics right... yes, a larger tube should make the level variation smaller. With the increased sensitivity, I would think the number of undesired cycles would go up to, though.

 

Right; so you use a smaller tube if you want fewer cycles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bump for a question on attaching the switch to a controller (I have an AC3). Do you need to buy the breakout box for the AC3 or does this simply plug into the controller?

 

I have an Osmolator which works great, but it requires another $60 option if I want to use a peristaltic pump with it to pump topoff from my basement. It also has no way to send me alarms via email if something goes wrong.

 

As far as reliability goes, have you noticed any issues with salt creep around the opening affecting reliability? I'm guessing for something that goes in and out of the water, this would be a problem, but it seems like reliability is one of the chief benefits of this switch in that it's not affected by coraline or salt creep. :blink:

The breakout box is not mandatory but it makes the setup much easier. Our digital out version just ships with a pair of bare wires for this purpose- plug them into a breakout box (or equavalent input connector on other controllers) and you're done. Otherwise, you can solder an appropriate plug on the end; the pinout diagram is listed in the neptune manual. It is not tricky to do, but you have to find a minidin-8 plug (I believe that is the plug format), likely from digikey.com.

 

Salt creep doesn't affect the sensor at all IME.

 

No, John, you have the physics right... yes, a larger tube should make the level variation smaller. With the increased sensitivity, I would think the number of undesired cycles would go up to, though.

I don't think this is right for two reasons. 1) pressure doesn't change based on diameter of container. e.g., a tube 1/8" diameter x 30 feet high full of water has the same pressure at the bottom as a tube 6' diameter x 30' high. The same principal applies in reverse, when a vessel of air is pushed underwater. 2) we tried varying tube diameters and saw no difference, so empirical evidence supports #1. But I'd be happy if I am wrong, as it would be really easy to adjust sensitivity of the ATO!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think this is right for two reasons. 1) pressure doesn't change based on diameter of container. e.g., a tube 1/8" diameter x 30 feet high full of water has the same pressure at the bottom as a tube 6' diameter x 30' high. The same principal applies in reverse, when a vessel of air is pushed underwater. 2) we tried varying tube diameters and saw no difference, so empirical evidence supports #1. But I'd be happy if I am wrong, as it would be really easy to adjust sensitivity of the ATO!

 

Yes, that is true, but the pressure is not being generated by the weight of the fluid, it is generated by changing the volume of a fixed amount of gas in the tube (i.e., the gas is being compressed). It is a PV/T relationship, not Pascal's law. To prove this to myself, I did some math...

 

[insert 20 minutes of playing with an excel doc here]...

 

...and found out that my thinking earlier was wrong!

 

It seems that the cross section of the tube ends up being factored out of the equation altogether. In this case p1v1/t1 = p2v2/t2, temperature cancels out since it is the same. Then inserting, substituting the equation for volume, and cancelling out stuff that is the same on both sides (diameter and pi) and you end up with p1h1 = p2h2 (where h1 is the length of the tube and h2 = h1-level change), so diameter doesn't matter at all.

 

I feel schooled! cry.gif

 

Thank you for setting me straight and reminding me once again that I should just look at the math up front since just thinking about it is not always intuitive!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Any idea when you guys will have the outlet version back in stock? Wanted to order one soon, but noticed they are out of stock on the website.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I saw your ATO in action at the Spring social event and was very impressed. I was going to buy one right there but you guys mentioned an updated ATO with a back-up float valve that will be out soon. When do you think this will be available? Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Steve

We're still testing the backup valve, but the current ATOs come with the new bracket that will hold the valve when available. The valve will be a $15 option for all ATO owners, whether old style (you'll get a new bracket too) or new style. We're not leaving anyone out for the upgrade :)

 

Justin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As much as I like this pressure switch, it has a major problem: the air tube pulls off the switch too easy. I was moving around electric wires, and it came off. Thank God I noticed it after a couple of hours. I am not sure what can be done about it, but it is a problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...