Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Regular radion lens on left, tir lens on right. First photo is low intensity, second photo is high intensity.

 

7782719720_63b3bb6429_c.jpg

7782720602_7564a7aba0_c.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...
(edited)

I upgraded one of the lens today....noticed that if u touch the lens ...it is much hotter than the previous lens...I guess it's focussed more ...thers also no more reflective lens ...the old silver metallic kind ..all replaced

 

It's also noticeably brighter ...I ended up scaling back and reducing intensity

Edited by Fishie

I upgraded one of the lens today....noticed that if u touch the lens ...it is much hotter than the previous lens...I guess it's focussed more ...thers no more reflective lens the old silver metallic kind once done

 

It's also noticely brighter ...I ended up scaling back and reducing intensity

 

wow, saving even more on the electric bill. nice!

pix as promised

 

file-13.jpg

 

left is with tir ...right without...

the lights are at around 30-40% intensity...

Regular radion lens on left, tir lens on right. First photo is low intensity, second photo is high intensity.

 

7782719720_63b3bb6429_c.jpg

7782720602_7564a7aba0_c.jpg

 

I think these pictures are very useful! Looking at the bottom one, clearly the spread is wider. But looking at the top one, you can see that in addition to the spread being wider, you are gaining a significant spot in the middle between the 2 "pucks" with the new lens. You can also see that the new lens provides for a slightly smaller hot spot under each puck. So it would appear that the laws of physics still hold, even for the Radions and that this greater coverage is gained by dispersing the light more evenly.

 

One thing to keep in mind is that each puck on the fixture has many individual LEDs. Therefore you shouldn't think of it as a flashlight that is being focused or spread but as many individual LEDs which can focused or spread as well as directed elsewhere, similar to what Viktoriia was saying.

 

IMHO the spread with the new lens make for a much better fixture.

IMHO the spread with the new lens make for a much better fixture.

 

Totally agree.

 

Fishie - are you glad you did the upgrade? Well worth the $30 right? I told Viktoriia they should do it as well. But remember to turn the intensity down for a while to avoid bleaching.

Totally agree.

 

Fishie - are you glad you did the upgrade? Well worth the $30 right? I told Viktoriia they should do it as well. But remember to turn the intensity down for a while to avoid bleaching.

 

 

yea Ryan...thx again for the push to go get it...lol..

i brought my intensity down from like 100 to 70-80...snipe!

All that money for radions......and then you have to pay more just to get what MH already has!! :tongue:

 

$30 vs...

 

a chiller...the higher monthly electric bill...$80 replacement bulbs every year.../yawn

If all it does is redirect previously wasted light, then IMHO it seems like it should be a standard part of the light. I'd be a little annoyed if I spent all that money on the light and then got hit for another $30 to make it perform as it should.

 

I see that case as different than if it is just changing the shape and some people might want it and some might not. Then it makes sense to sell it seperate. But, from teh pictures posted above, it doesn't seem like there is any reason not to have it and in that case it feels like it should be included and not an upsell to an already expensive light.

well the way ecotech is selling it is as an optional upgrade. many folks with shallow tanks wouldn't need the new lens. they are already running the stock radions at 40% intensity, so adding these lenses and running them at 20% intensity wouldn't really make sense. but imo, for anyone with a tank thats 20"+ tall, it's worth the $30.

IMHO the spread with the new lens make for a much better fixture.

 

 

Totally agree.

 

 

If all it does is redirect previously wasted light, then IMHO it seems like it should be a standard part of the light. I'd be a little annoyed if I spent all that money on the light and then got hit for another $30 to make it perform as it should.

 

I see that case as different than if it is just changing the shape and some people might want it and some might not. Then it makes sense to sell it seperate. But, from teh pictures posted above, it doesn't seem like there is any reason not to have it and in that case it feels like it should be included and not an upsell to an already expensive light.

 

I agree with Hypertech. The spread is better and addresses a flaw in the previous fixture design. I can't see a reason why people wouldn't want the new lens. Sure for deeper tanks you want the greater penetration that the old lens provides but why would you want a fixture with two bright spots and a dim area in the middle? You could just put two light cannons next to each other.

(edited)

If all it does is redirect previously wasted light, then IMHO it seems like it should be a standard part of the light. I'd be a little annoyed if I spent all that money on the light and then got hit for another $30 to make it perform as it should.

 

I see that case as different than if it is just changing the shape and some people might want it and some might not. Then it makes sense to sell it seperate. But, from teh pictures posted above, it doesn't seem like there is any reason not to have it and in that case it feels like it should be included and not an upsell to an already expensive light.

 

Maybe it was designed the way it was intended originally. maybe this upgrade lens is a brand new idea that their engineer just thought of, happens all the time with other products. cant really give away new ideas for free, well, maybe, but I wouldnt call it "standard part of the light"...it's not like the original had defects or bugs or something...

Edited by hlem

maybe this upgrade lens is a brand new idea that their engineer just thought of, happens all the time with other products. cant really give away new ideas for free, well, maybe, but I wouldnt call it "standard part of the light"...it's not like the original had defects or bugs or something...

 

I can see selling an newly developed upgrade to previous purchasers. But, I don't think they are including it on new purchases either. So, if you were to walk into a store today, you would need to buy the light and the lens.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...