jamal April 2, 2007 April 2, 2007 i have a 180 with 3 halides and i am upgrading to 400 watt lights and there is an advertisement that say over a 6 foot tank i would be able to use two lights rather than three any thoughts on this? "The nature of the design will allow the typical hobbiest with a six foot tank to burn two lamps and get uniform light distribution over the entire length of the aquarium."
Grav April 3, 2007 April 3, 2007 I find that any MH bulb is good for a 2*2 area. 3*2 isn't much biggger, but you will see dark spots.
dandy7200 April 3, 2007 April 3, 2007 I think I would like to see the link to the ad. Luminarcs give a 3x3 spread and thats about all I've heard of that doesn't drop par in the corners like grav said.
jamesbuf April 3, 2007 April 3, 2007 Out of curiosity, why the switch? 3 X 250 is about the same light as 2 X 400 isn't it? I'm still new to MH so correct me if I'm wrong. How would the PAR compare?
chideloh April 3, 2007 April 3, 2007 Hi Jamal, The problem with your tank with 2 light configuration is that there are two braces where you would put the lights. If it wasn't for that, you could go with 2 400 watt with Luminarcs. But really, I don't think you need to upgrade to 400 from 250, if that's what you have.
jason the filter freak April 3, 2007 April 3, 2007 I second james question, how diffrent is the 3 light config... why "upgrade"?
jwildman April 3, 2007 April 3, 2007 I too have a 180 with 3@ 250MH's and have been looking at an upgrade. However I am going the route of luminarcs. They will do 2 things for me. 1) help me with heat with the AC units 2) Give me better coverage and light at depth without dumping the 250's. I would be concerned about the heat on the 400's, unless you have a chiller, then it is a non-issue. Regards, John
jamal April 3, 2007 Author April 3, 2007 i have 3 150 watt mh's not 250. thats why i am upgrading. also i plan to run bluer lights so i figured i would go with the 400 watt lights to compensate for the lost par since i wont be running 10k's
jwildman April 3, 2007 April 3, 2007 I would go with 3 250's rather than 2 400's ... would also highly suggest looking into Luminarcs. John i have 3 150 watt mh's not 250. thats why i am upgrading. also i plan to run bluer lights so i figured i would go with the 400 watt lights to compensate for the lost par since i wont be running 10k's
jamal April 3, 2007 Author April 3, 2007 you dont think the lost par would be a problem since i am running 14 or 20 k bulbs? would the lumenarcs make up for this. what is so special about these fixtures?
chideloh April 3, 2007 April 3, 2007 Hey Jamal, If you want to run 14 or 20 K bulbs, then I would say go with the 400s with or without Luminarcs. May want to look into a chiller, though.
jamal April 3, 2007 Author April 3, 2007 i have a 1/4 hp chiller now which i hope will be sufficient for this undertaking. i just know that i want to keep mostly clams and sps corals so i want to make sure they have the light they need. can anyone point me to a link or something about the lumenarcs thanx guys
jamal April 3, 2007 Author April 3, 2007 thanx chris, also what do you guys think about me getting 3x 250 watt bulbs and and 6 or 8 t5's or more supplemental lighting to make up? would this work?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now