Jump to content

KingOfAll_Tyrants

WAMAS Member
  • Content Count

    362
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About KingOfAll_Tyrants

  • Rank
    Reefer

Custom Fields

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Arlington

Recent Profile Visitors

432 profile views
  1. I would. Maximas generally live in areas with high light and flow, on the rocks. Can't help you with ORP, though, unfortunately. :(
  2. Thanks to Capital Aquarium and @MeganTheProfishional for a warm welcome a few days ago, and for running a small operation with a good supply of stuff and livestock, in quality condition! And thanks for a a good condition tailspot blenny! It was eating and active quite well in the store, and is doing well now in QT. It seemed to be nibbling on some algae within a day of arrival, and generally stays out side of the rock cave I've given it, until I come by. (I spook it. :D ). I think I'll add him to the DT by the beginning of next week.
  3. I was in a few days ago (thanks @MeganTheProfishional) and the corner tank is a real steal! Unfortunately it's not the tank design/shape I'm looking for. :(
  4. this is about 16 inches from the surface. Intensity got up to 100%. As I recall, the PAR measurements were between 50 to 100 PAR. if you want, I can dig through my notes and try to find the number. I found the Kessils do pretty well for this coral.
  5. My kind of tank. That being said, his tank was very clean (when I saw it) and even though I added a big piece of red planet that he very generously gave me, I've had no hitchikers at all. (for my part, I have a fair number of things that came in on aquacultured kp aquatics live rock - tube worms, several bivalves, brittle stars, sponges, etc. But AFAIC nothing dangerous from anyone else's tank..... yet. :O I did have a asterina star infestation, but those disappeared long ago)
  6. I have a good amount of Caulerpa mexicana, i think. I am at Arlington, though.
  7. Nice! Thanks for sharing, that's pretty awesome. My guess is that it will be eaten by eager filter feeders in your tank. But if you're worried, IMO a water change won't hurt at all.
  8. Random thoughts that came to me when I looked at one of my corals yesterday. This was my first stony coral; I got it from Azim in December 2017. (the pic of it on the sandbed was the day I introduced it) It did OK for a bit, but then went through a rough patch, to include some bleaching last year (thanks to dpassar for taking it in when it was injured and I was out for like a month last year). Now, looking at it (the second picture), I swear that the "brain" grows noticeably every day. There was at least 1-2 coralites that were flat on the rock on Saturday, now presumably part of the "brain". The colony definitely further encrusts daily……….. it's grown well under a Kessil 360, and a dosing regimen that tries to keep DKH around 8.0 or so.
  9. I tried more gelly stuff for a long time, but tried this yesterday. Didn't work so well. :( http://www.loctiteproducts.com/en/products/fix/super-glue/loctite_super_glueultraliquidcontrol.html
  10. Ditto from me! I didn't know we had an FB group, and I joined the NOVA group.
  11. Paul, I like it. Perhaps I'll try one again; I do have lots of iittle sponges and filter feeders.
  12. Ah, this business again. First, there is a problem with the supply chain. The stereotypical one goes from collector to small island to major depot, thru major airports to LA wholesalers, and from there to the LFS. The potential for death in all of this is enormous. People have been saying that big wholesalers like Quality Marine - despite its claimed efforts to improve the supply chain - have more and more diseased fish. I would like to have a much more direct collector-to-consumer relationship, that is I would like to purchsae from the collector if at all possible. This is why I generally highly recommend KP Aquatics, an excellent Florida collector. I would pay good money for similar services from a collector in the East Pacific. Second, buying fish that have been cyanided, etc. is 100% wrong. Further, there should be a very careful reckoning of what fish are suitable for aquarium use, and which ones are not due to diet, etc. This is not new; John Tullock's book "The Natural Reef Aquarium" had a whole chapter on this ("net-caught or nothing"), which unfortunately is not remotely dated. :( All that being said, this kind of anti-aquarium argument is ultimately silly. Not to even hit the points it raises, which have been refuted above: - the number of species purchased for the aquarium hobby is a very small percentage of the total fish on a given coral reef (to say nothing of the broader ocean). And as we know, careful coral collection is 100% sustainable. (though of course cutting huge swaths of stuff willy nilly and throwing it in bags without any care for its survival is not) - aquarium collection is very low in things that "harm" a coral reef - again, unless it's done poorly with no regard for sustainability). Local pollution, damage from careless boating or non-aquarium fishing, warming, even using live rock for local buildings is far more "dangerous" than aquarium collecting. (I'll never forget a picture I saw from some south pacific nation where they were hauling a giant boulder- what we'd call "premium live rock" - out of the ocean to be used as builing material. [very uncommon species like the Banggai cardinal are an exception: at least last I heard, it was rapidly overfished to the point of being rare in its native waters. But then, either intentionally or IMO more likely just as a byproduct of fishermen throwing out marginal specimens that recover, it was introduced into areas it's not native to and is doing well.] - which gets to another point: collection of coral reef fish for local human consumption kills way more reef fish that aquarium collecting. I am told that the export of live reef fish and inverts for dinner tables in East Asia (i.e. China - and mind you I am Chinese) far outweighs export of live fish for aquaria. (and if one banned the export of life reef fish for East Asian consumption, it would, like drugs, cause the price of smuggled food fishes to rise astronomically. And besides, I know of no coral reef country that's banned export of live reef animals to China for food, as much as some of them posture about aquarium fish, because that trade is larger and is worth much more money than aquarium fish) - ORA, Sustainable aquatics, etc. have AFAIK basically crowded out the market for wild collected clownfish. There are numerous small Australian coral farms for apparently the local reef market, and coral farms in other countries supply a good amount of US coral imports. Of course, not every fish is at comparable levels of aquarium demand/suitability, so I think we will never be at the point where it's reasonable to captive grown every single species. (I'd also say that some species - e.g. lawnmower blennies - are not nearly as common captive bred as I would like). But I think it's practical to get maybe 66% of the way there, now. (and there are a lot of wild caught species that IMO should be caught in much smaller numbers because they're not anywhere near as suitable in an aquarium as their rampant easy availability suggests they should be -.e.g Yellow Tangs) - Finally, the ethics thing is just a rabbit hole. Ultimately, a store must treat these animals (as well as parrot, parakeets, even dogs and cats) as livestock. And before one hem-and-haws about that, I would ask why would one hold a dog owner to task, while ignoring the conditions of farm animals? For an aquatic parallel, where does the cut off come - why is it acceptable that 100% of oysters harvested in the chesapeake bay die within a few days of harvest and the industry has a waste percentage of (made up number) 10%, but that, say, 10% of yellow tangs don't survive the collector-to-Ifs process? Why is it acceptable for me to kill thousands of newborn brine shrimp at fish feeding time, while PETA and Sea Shepherd laments the loss of any fish in an aquarium? Also, I don't buy the "fish would be happier in the sea" argument. Assuming a (subjectively) decent quality of sustenance, space, habitat can be provided for the fish, I think anything is fair game. Clownfish in the wild do not stray far from their host anemones because they are not suitable as general reef fish. Royal grammas do not grow that big and stay IVO a given cave. Similar with lawnmower blennies. The criteria need to be changed for each species. (this is why I'm a member of the tang police). Finally, each fish produces 1000s of fry over its lifetime; if you have much more than 3 of those fry survive to reproduce, the species will take over the reef. I don't see why, when 1000s of fish die in the wild before having the chance to reproduce, one would make a big deal of a paltry percentage of those that end up in aquaria. Now, I can't abide sterotypical factory farming of pigs, and even though they of course in the end they are eaten anyway, I pay a premium for "non factory farmed organic", etc. meat when at all possible. I am completely against pet abuse and am fine with strict laws against abusers - I can't abide that someone has done the horrible things you'd see if you googled "cat abuse" to something as sweet as my Harriet. Likewise, I check the source of my fish and corals as much as I can to ensure they're from decent suppliers, and I think carefully if/how my aquarium can reasonably allow something like their wild habits. Harriet:
  13. Neat tank! I've subscribed. I like the 30 gallon frag tank, in general, and this is a good way to populate it. As far as other fish in the tank, assuming you keep the maroon pair, you maybe could try a pair of melanopsus or similar clowns, assuming that the maroons feel they have enough anemone to live in. (I'm told they can be aggressive, of course, so I'm not so sure about this). You also could maybe keep a pair of Banggai cardinals; they are supposed to sometimes live in BTAs, though not anywhere near the degree of a clownfish. It seems to me you don't have enough space for a "real" harem tank (20+ ocellaris), if you had say 7 it might be hard to diffuse aggression among them (which accoding to what I've seen with harem tanks is one of the big long term problems with them). One fish would eventually become the scapegoat and die. Notwithstanding the fact that many fish school when they're small and seperate into breeding pairs after a few years when they mature. Anyway, I'll be interested to see how this tank grows!
  14. Yeah, my understanding is that it requires the new ($400 base unit) apex.
  15. Very nice work. Good luck on the new pump. IIRC, this one is lit by two Kessil 360s and then 4x T5s in an LED-T5 fixture?
×
×
  • Create New...